On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:13:17 +0100 "Newton, Philip" <Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de> wrote: > coi .ian. do cusku di'e > > .i.e'u ko troci tu'a la jbofi'e .i.o'acu'i mi ta'e pilno ri lepu'u > > cipra pu mi gubyternoi > > Maybe you should use it a bit more :) > > "I habitually use it for the purpose of (the <process-of [testing > before me]>-type-of public-message-author)" looks a bit strange to me. > Things aren't grouping the way you probably intended them to. > > I'm not too hot on pu'u (nor grammar in general), but maybe you want > something more along the lines of {mi ta'e pilno ri lepu'u cipra kei > pu lenu mi gubyternoi} with an extra {kei} to close of the {le pu'u} > abstraction and a {le nu} after {pu}? Am I the only one that noticed his usage of "ri"? Doesn't "ri" mean the last sumti? ie "mi pilno ri" would be "I use myself". Or am I just way off my rocker? -- Theodore Reed (rizen/bancus) -==- http://www.surreality.us/ ~OpenPGP Signed/Encrypted Mail Preferred; Finger me for my public key!~ "[...] for plainly, although every work of art is an expression, not every expression is a work of art." -- DeWitt H. Parker, "The Principles of Aesthetics"
Attachment:
pgpBSLNQyluBu.pgp
Description: PGP signature