[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delayed response to jimc on indicators (long)
- To: "Arthur W. Protin Jr." (GC-ACCURATE) <protin@PICA.ARMY.MIL>
- Subject: Re: delayed response to jimc on indicators (long)
- From: cbmvax!uunet!math.ucla.edu!jimc
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 90 09:37:50 -0700
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Sep 90 18:16:20 EDT." <9009051816.aa17940@COR4.PICA.ARMY.MIL>
- Resent-date: Wed, 7 Aug 91 12:29:34 EDT
- Resent-from: cbmvax!uunet!PICA.ARMY.MIL!protin
- Resent-message-id: <9108071636.AA07851@relay1.UU.NET> 17 Sep 90 12:39 EDT
- Resent-to: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
> and if you cannot adequately represent the more complex expressions of
> metaphysics, then DON'T WORRY about them. They are more likely a figment
> of some ambiguity of the language that they originated in than an expression
> of an idea worthy of my attention. PLEASE DON'T CLUTTER UP LOJBAN to deal
> with them. In other words, if some metaphysics debate sounds nonsensical
> in lojban, assume it is nonsensical and lojban is working perfectly.
Right on!
-- jimc