WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


Number subgrammar

posts: 1912

Robin:
> OK. John has made it very clear that this is *not* the purpose of pi'e,
> that jo'i is the general tuple creator.

I changed my grammar accordingly. Now pi'e can mix freely with the
digits and with ki'o. I think {ki'o} should bind closer than {pi'e},
so there would be no grouping comma for high base macro-digits. Or
maybe it should be the other way around? What are more frequent,
less-than-four-digit numbers in bases higher than 1000, or
more-than-three-digit numbers in bases higher than 16? Probably both
are so infrequent that it is not worth having a rule for this. Let's
just say that combining ki'o and pi'e is bad.

mu'o mi'e xorxes





__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail