WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


Number subgrammar

On Tuesday 20 July 2004 18:49, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 06:43:44PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > It is also possible to express imaginary numbers in base 1-i, without
> > using ni'u or ka'o. (1+i doesn't work. Why?)
>
> "1+i" doesn't work in what sense?

I think you're asking the same thing I'm asking. The representation is binary
in base 1+i or 1-i; base 1-i works, but base 1+i doesn't.

phma
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa