WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


Robin's gadri Proposal

posts: 14214

On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:44:10AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 06:49:38AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > > I'm not disagreeing, I'm just not sure I understand. Can you
> > > > give a value for the second sentence that can't be encompassed
> > > > by the first?
> > >
> > > The obvious value from the example I gave is {le zarci}. {mi ja'a
> > > klama le zarci} is not the same answer as {mi ja'a klama su'o le
> > > zarci} to the question {xu do klama le zarci}.
> >
> > I thought you said that "le broda" was equal to "su'o da poi broda"
> > in CLL lo?
>
> In CLL {lo broda} is {su'o da poi broda}, and {le broda} is {ro da poi
> mi ke'a do skicu lo ka broda}.

Oh.

Duh.

No wonder you had trouble explaining to me where the problem was.

-Robin