Robin's gadri Proposal
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:49:33PM -0400, xod wrote:
> When I say "klama", doesn't that mean "zo'e klama zo'e zo'e zo'e
> zo'e"?
It does.
> Then, klama noda is not covered by the meaning of klama, making it a
> different selbri.
One way to look at it, and one which I would be willing to enshrine, is
that "klama no da" == "klama zi'o", which is, indeed, a different
selbri.
> Now what if we discover a piece of text where the value noda is
> understood as obvious for a certain place, and is being elided in that
> context?
A: mi gasnu co favytcini lo samru'e li pa
B: xu cnino samru'e
A: go'i
B: .ua do gasnu co favytcini fo no da
And there you are.
> In a sense you are claiming that noda is never an obvious term and
> never an irrelevant possibility. Isn't that bold?
Seems pretty bold to me, yeah.
-Robin