BPFK Section: Grammatical Pro-sumti
I seem to have done a 180, but I'll stick with where I am now on the {du'u}-{ka} issue. Practically, {ka} is more likely to be a function (we talk more about beauty than Joan's beauty) (though I do miss the adverb idea) and possibly more about beauty than being beautiful. So, I think I agree that {du'u} is less likely to contain {ce'u} than {ka} is and so get require all to be explicit. {ke'a} is always going to be called for in relative clauses, so we can drop the first one with assurance.
wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote:Re: BPFK Section: Grammatical Pro-sumti
I don't understand
http://www.lojban.org/tiki//tiki-index.php?page=ka%2C+du%27u%2C+si%27o%2C+ce%27u%2C+zo%27e
terribly well, but I will attempt to abide by it. Please let me know if I'm confused.
-Robin