Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 01:30:03PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> BTW, in another post yesterday I expanded:
>
> ci prenu noi melbi cu klama
>
> as:
>
> ci da poi prenu zo'u ge da melbi gi da klama
>
> which is not quite right. An expansion like that would work for
> {su'oci}, but exact quantifiers are more complex beasts.
> The expansion for {ci} would be something like:
>
> ci prenu cu klama ije ro da poi prenu gi'e klama cu melbi
That doesn't much differ from what I have now. I thought you were worred
about breaking it out into two sentences.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"