WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed

posts: 2388

Well, I only know what it looks like to me, namely with quoted material marked off with a solid line along the side. The flaw in this is that it does not allow me to make comments directly attached to the quoted passage being commented upon, hence the top comments. I can move them to the bottom if you would like that better. As for the barbarous quoting technique that somehow ages ago became the norm and has not changed with the times, I am not strongly inclined to convert to it, especially since the only person who regularly reads what I write has never complained about it. Perhaps you all would consider getting your defective systems upgraded to something more 21st century.

Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 01:36:12PM -0700, John E Clifford wrote:
> What exactly is the problem (i.e., what is "improper")?.

You top post.

You don't quote properly (using >).

> My stuff comes to me looking much better than the people who have so
> many tiers of indents and arrows that it is virtually impossible to
> figure who said what.

Then your mail program is *BROKEN*, and you should fix it.

> Y'all didn't like my old stuff with continental quotes; what do you
> want?

We want you to do with the rest of us are doing, because your crap is
impossible for the rest of us to read.

How many times do we have to tell you this?

-Robin