Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed
> I think that is all I ever wanted: that zo'e can refer to the empty set
> when appropriate.
When would you need it, for example?
> We could make an analogy with monetary values. If something is free, we
> could say that it has no (monetary!) value, or that it has a value, and
> that value's magnitude happens to be 0. They are both true.
Well, in Lojban {ta rupnu li no} says that it costs zero dollars, and
{ta rupnu no da} says that it has no monetary value. But they couldn't
both be true at the same time! The second one says that nothing is
related to ta by the {rupnu} relationship, and the first one says that
the value li no is related to ta by the {rupnu} relationship. Only
one of them can be true.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail