Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 05:38:32PM -0400, xod wrote:
> So I guess if zero is the number of items that make the bridi true, then
> it refers to the empty set. The definition suggests that zo'e can
> represent a full expression that belongs in a tergi'u, beyond a simple
> sumti.
I don't think that the empty set is very often a replacement for "zo'e".
Though it could be for, say, "zo'e cmacyselcmi", or "zoimy {} my sinxa zo'e".
You're just really grasping for a way that something called "nothing" can be
something. If you do that, you have to be very careful, or else you get into
classic tricks:
Nothing is better than eternal life.
A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
Therefore a ham sandwich is better than eternal life.
--
Rob Speer