WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


Wiki page BPFK Section: Grammatical Pro-sumti changed

posts: 14214

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 05:12:44AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > >
> > > I wonder if I can now go and redefine {lo'e} and {le'e} as:
> > >
> > > lo'e broda = zo'e noi zu'i no'u ke'a broda
> > >
> > > le'e broda = zo'e noi mi do ke'a skicu lo ka zu'i no'u ce'u
> > > broda
> >
> > I don't see how that works, since zu'i isn't filling a bridi
> > place there, really.
>
> In both cases it's filling the x1 of broda.

Err, sorry.

> What is a 'bridi' for you? (Still, I'm not at all sure it works,
> because it is not clear how zu'i is supposed to work in
> subordinate bridi. Is it the typical thing that fills just the
> subordinate bridi, or the typical thing for the whole bridi?

It's the typical thing for only the place it appears in, I think,
but I don't really know. I think the most important thing about
zu'i is that it's fuzzy. :-)

-Robin