WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed

posts: 14214

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 05:46:00AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 06:53:24PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > >
> > > > || noi | PA broda noi brode cu brodi | PA broda goi ko'a cu
> > > > brode .i je ko'a cu brodi
> > >
> > > You have brode and brodi interchanged.

Correct. Fixed.

> > > {PA broda poi} could be defined accurately as:
> > >
> > > PA broda poi brode | PA ckaji be lo ka ce'u broda gi'e brode
> > >
> > > More generally, for any sumti:
> > >
> > > [PA] sumti poi broda | [PA] lo ckaji be lo ka ce'u me
> > > sumti gi'e broda
> >
> > Can that trick be made to work for ro? Seems like it cood.
>
> It works for any PA, including ro and no, as far as I can tell.

Unfortunately, it doesn't work at all:

PA lo ckaji be lo ka ce'u me sumti gi'e broda

Using your gadri formula:

= PA da poi ke'a me ckaji be lo ka ce'u me sumti gi'e broda

Immediately and fatally recursive.

-Robin