WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


BPFK Section: Inexact Numbers

posts: 149

Jorge Llamb?as scripsit:

> If we want to identify {pimu} with {pa fi'u re} as quantifiers, then
> we must:
>
> 1) Drop CLL's interpretation of piPA's with masses and sets,
> 2) Drop the idea that masses and sets are possible values of da,
> 3) Drop the interpretation of {PA1fi'uPA2} as PA1 out of every PA2,
> 4) Find some other definitions that are consistent with all of that.

I choose 3; I see no reason why pa fi'u re should have special
semantics. Mathematically, li pa fi'u re du li pimu li pa fe'i re,
and all three (with vei-ve'o brackets in the last case) should mean
the same thing as sumti quantifiers.

--
He played King Lear as though John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
someone had played the ace. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--Eugene Field http://www.reutershealth.com