Re: BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts
> rlpowell:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 08:52:06PM -0800, wikidiscuss@lojban.org
> wrote:
> >
> > Re: BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts
> >
> > Okay, I've updated my recommendation to include the new sections.
> >
> > I've avoided the word "deprecated", instead using arj's wording
> > that the words should not be included in future learning
> > materials.
>
> Please make sure that it is absolutely clear whether your proposal
> is that these cmavo be freed for future, different uses. You are
> welcome to even state a proposed timeline for making them available
> for re-use, if you wish.
Am I missing something here? Isn't the purpose of the BPFK project to make the last changes to Lojban, ever? If cmavo forms are to be relinquished sometime in the future, someone has to have the authority to make that change happen.
For the record, I can live with keeping the cmavo, and I can live with scrapping or reassigning the cmavo, but at the moment I'm not able to see any benefits of a solution in between.