WikiDiscuss

On Sunday 07 November 2004 22:27, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 10:20:30PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 November 2004 22:11, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 04:22:08PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > > > ti ba'e skargolu la karsarli sa za'e mantanko la marcuigli
> > >
> > > Umm, and your point would be?
> >
> > {sa za'e} appears to be an error, rather than erasing back to
> > {ba'e}, since the rule makes it invisible.
>
> Yes, but the rule operates left-to-right.

Yes. {ba'e} is on the left, so it has already been made invisible by the rule
by the time the preprocessor gets to {sa}, so {sa} has no BAhE to erase back
to. If {za'e} were invisible, {sa} would erase back to the previous brivla,
which is {karsarli}.

phma
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci