Magic Words
> >zo-word = ZO any-word
> >bu-word = any-word BU
> >
> >Where:
> >
> >any-word = zo-word | zei-word | bu-word | lo'u-word
> > | zoi-word | A | ... | ZOhU
> >
> 'Ang on. If zo-word is ZO+any-word, and and any-word can be a zo-word,
> then doesn't the grammar imply that "zo zo broda" is *one* word, a
> doubly-quoted "broda"? That seems to be the precedence we get from these.
If I understand correctly how this works, in {zo zo broda} first {zo zo}
will be processed as a "zo-word", and then we have "zo-word broda". The
second zo never gets a chance to form a zo-word.
OTOH, in {zo broda bu}, {zo broda} first becomes a "zo-word", and
then {zo-word bu} becomes a "bu-word".
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com