WikiDiscuss

Posted by rlpowell on Wed 24 of Nov, 2004 19:13 GMT posts: 14214

On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:29:16AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Powell scripsit:
>
> > So {mi klama mu'i nai lo nu mi nelci} is equivalent to
> > {na ku mi klama mu'i lo nu mi nelci}?
> >
> > That seems like a *bad* idea to me.
>
> *shrug*
>
> It's the only interpretation that's consistent with the fact that
> "mi punaijeca klama" means "naku mi pu klama .ije mi ca klama", an
> identity which has held since Loglan days.

Those are *VERY* different.

The {mu'i} one reduces the main bridi to a non-veridical status.

-Robin