WikiDiscuss

---

> What about {secau} as a sentence connection? In {ko'a cliva .isecaubo mi
> djuno}, do I necessarily know that she left (even if I didn't know it at the
> time)? Do I have to say {mi da'i djuno} if I never find out?

If you never find out, it's hard to understand why you would say
that sentence at all. A better example might be {mi cliva isecaubo
ko'a djuno la'e di'u}.

If {ju'a} is assumed for both sentences, then it doesn't seem to make
much sense. I leave, she knows it, and my leaving lacks her knowing it?

Although {ju'a} is often the intended mood for an unmarked utterance,
I don't think we should stipulate that in the absence of any mood
marker we _must_ assume {ju'a}. I'd rather allow context to be able
to override that.

But better say {mi cliva secau lo nu ko'a djuno}, just in case.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail