PEG Morphology Algorithm
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 02:33:25PM -0800, wikidiscuss@lojban.org
wrote:
> Re: PEG Morphology Algorithm
>
> I have now added handling of rafsi fuhivla, so except for some
> minor adjustments I will probably have to do, the morphology PEG
> is basically ready. Anyone wants to test it?
I'll see what I can do. Pierre, can you point me to your latest
test suite again?
Which reminds me: I want to make it clear that I'm very happy about
Pierre's work on valfendi. I don't think it's the right approach
for language definitional purposes (and I told him that right when
he started), but that doesn't mean it's worthless, and I don't want
to give the impression that I think that.
Pierre's work on valfendi serves two important purposes: it built up
a reservoir of expertise in him on the topic, and it got us
something to test *against*. Having valfendi's output to compare my
own to means we can debug both methods better.
So, Pierre, thank you. And hook me up with those test cases,
please.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/