WikiDiscuss

> > > *** Sentence: muSTE.laVIson 1
> > > MISMATCH!
> > > valfendi: >muSTE< -la VIson.
> > > pegbased: -mu (STEla) VIson.
> >
> > Oh dear, does PEG really do that?
>
> As it turns out, no:
[snip]
> Let me figure out where my test script is borked.

Fixed:

• Sentence: muSTE.laVIson
• Sentence: muSTE.laVIson ESC[033m1ESC[000m

MISMATCH!
valfendi: >muSTE< -la VIson.
pegbased: -mu >STE.< -la VIson.

The new mismatch list for these words is:

• Sentence: muSTElaVIson 1

MISMATCH!
valfendi: >muSTE< -la VIson.
pegbased: -mu (STEla) VIson.

• Sentence: MUstela.VIson 1

MISMATCH!
valfendi: (MUste) -la VIson.
pegbased: (MUste) -la. VIson.

• Sentence: muSTEla.VIson 1

MISMATCH!
valfendi: -mu (STEla) VIson.
pegbased: -mu (STEla.) VIson.

• Sentence: MUste.laVIson 1

MISMATCH!
valfendi: (MUste) -la VIson.
pegbased: (MUste.) -la VIson.

• Sentence: muSTE.laVIson 1

MISMATCH!
valfendi: >muSTE< -la VIson.
pegbased: -mu >STE.< -la VIson.

• Sentence: MUste.la.VIson 1

MISMATCH!
valfendi: (MUste) -la VIson.
pegbased: (MUste.) -la. VIson.

• Sentence: muSTE.la.VIson 1

MISMATCH!
valfendi: >muSTE< -la VIson.
pegbased: -mu >STE.< -la. VIson.

• Sentence: muSTEl,aVIson 1

MISMATCH!
valfendi: >muSTE< -l,a VIson.
pegbased: -mu (STEl,a) VIson.

Unfortunately, valfendi drops . and my parser doesn't, so these
don't compare properly in several cases. I'll have to hack my test
script more.

<sigh>

-Robin