WikiDiscuss

On Thursday 06 January 2005 09:02, Jorge "Llambías" wrote:
> I would certainly like to reduce the number of selma'o,
> and not only those that are identical but for the SA rule
> (TAhE and ZAhO, UI and CAI, DAhO and FUhO, and I think
> that's it). I would put UI, CAI, NAI, FUhE, DAhO, FUhO,
> RAhO and GAhO all in the same selma'o, for example,
> and the same for BAI, CAhA, CUhE, KI, ZI, PU, VA, ZEhA,
> VEhA and VIhA (see
> <http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Internal+grammar+of+tags>).

I think RAhO and GAhO should be kept separate. RAhO occurs only after GOhA,
and GAhO occurs only next to BIhI. What would make sense is allowing RAhO
after brivla and considering all GOhA as brivla, and allowing BIhI with only
one GAhO.

phma

--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci