Robin's gadri Proposal
Re: Robin's gadri Proposal
> Personal Specificity — sa'e
> The specific thing(s) I have in mind (i.e. "le", but without implication
> of veridicality).
I insist that {le} has no implication of veridicality, so the comment
'"le", but without implication of veridicality' does not make sense.
> le broda ~= lo sa'e broda == su'o da poi mi pensi ke'a zi'e
> poi ke'a broda
"~=" here means approximately equal, right? (Sometimes "~" is
used for negation.) Does this mean that you are dropping CLL's
default {[ro] le}?
Consider:
le prenu cu klama le zarci
CLL: Each of the people I have in mind goes to each of the
markets I have in mind.
RGP: At least one of the people I have in mind goes to at
least one of the markets I have in mind.
XS: The people I have in mind go to the markets I have in mind.
I believe XS is closest to usage, and CLL is the canonical
prescription, but your version is neither.
mu'o mi'e xorxes