Robin's gadri Proposal
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 07:04:40AM -0700, wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote:
> Re: Robin's gadri Proposal
>
> > Personal Specificity ??? sa'e The specific thing(s) I have in mind
> > (i.e. "le", but without implication of veridicality).
>
> I insist that {le} has no implication of veridicality, so the comment
> '"le", but without implication of veridicality' does not make sense.
Fair.
> > le broda ~= lo sa'e broda == su'o da poi mi pensi ke'a zi'e poi ke'a
> > broda
>
> "~=" here means approximately equal, right? (Sometimes "~" is used for
> negation.) Does this mean that you are dropping CLL's default {[ro]
> le}?
No, I just forgot about it.
> Consider:
>
> le prenu cu klama le zarci
>
> CLL: Each of the people I have in mind goes to each of the
> markets I have in mind.
> RGP: At least one of the people I have in mind goes to at
> least one of the markets I have in mind.
> XS: The people I have in mind go to the markets I have in mind.
>
> I believe XS is closest to usage, and CLL is the canonical
> prescription, but your version is neither.
RGP? You meant RLP, yes? In which case, where did you find a keyboard
where G is close to L?
-Robin