WikiDiscuss

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:10:07PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > Other things we should probably include. Please let me know if
> > I'm insane or missing anytihng.
> >
> > All the eks:
> >
> > ek
>
> As joik-ek. In other words, {ko'a e ko'e sa joi ko'e} should give
> {ko'a joi ko'e}.

OK.

> > jek
>
> I wouldn't particularly like to include this.

Whyever not?

> > joik
>
> Yes, as part of joik-ek.
>
> > interval
>
> Yes, as part of joik-ek.

Oh, didn't know interval was in there. You're right.

> > gek
>
> It should be already included in SA term / SA bridi-tail / SA
> sentence. Separating these last two may be tricky.

Can you expand on that last bit?

> > guhek
>
> {sa gu'e} should already be one case of {sa bridi-tail}.

Sort of, yeah. I suppose it'll do.

Example:

mi broda gu'e brodi gi brodo da de di sa gu'e brodo gi brodi

gives:

mi gu'e brodo gi brodi

> > Forethought termsets:
> >
> > termset
>
> Forethought termsets are included as terms.

Yes, but we can't get back to the beginning of a forethought termset
that way. We'll end up replacing the last term in it.

> I'm not sure about {SA ce'e}.

Doesn't work. I'm limited in the extent to which I care.

-Robin

--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/