BPFK Section: Text Structure cmavo
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 07:50:13AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > The only thing is I have doubts that "sentence" is
> > > well-defined enough.
> >
> > The bit between successive .i, NIhO, LU or TUhE.
>
> LU is not directly related to sentences: inside it can have more
> than one sentence, and as a whole it is just a sumti.
True.
> In parser terms, a sentence is a selbri plus zero or more
> preceding and/or following terms, the prenex is not defined as a
> part of a sentence. Maybe it would be better to use {bridi} for
> that.
Oh. You're right. A prenex can, in fact, be followed by multiple
logically joined sentences as well.
Let's just say that a prenex comes before one or more logically
connected Lojban sentences, OK?
-Robin