BPFK Section: Inexact Numbers
> Re: BPFK Section: Inexact Numbers
> It seems to me that for ji'i to be useful, it needs to scope to the
> right; that is "pa ji'i re no no" is 1000 + ji'i re 100s + ji'i no 10s
> + ji'i no 1s
>
> I haven't read your proposal well enough to tell if this is already
> the case, but wanted to mention it.
In my proposal, ji'i does scope to the right, but it cannot appear
between the digits of a number.
When two quantifiers with a range operator (su'o, su'e, za'u, me'i, ji'i)
appear one next to the other, they indicate a number in the common
range. For example:
za'u ci me'i so
more than three less than 9
su'o ci su'e so
between three and nine
ji'i ci ji'i vo
around three or four
When there is no common range, the union of ranges is used instead:
za'u vo me'i vo
more than four less than four
other than four
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo