WikiDiscuss

---

> > The current PEG allows initial clusters of up to three consonants
> > (spr, ckl, jgl, zdr and the like) and non-initial clusters of up
> > to four consonants, which are formed by a consonant followed
> > by an initial cluster. That's for fuhivla.
>
> Erm, the tststswhateverthehell example had rather a lot more. What
> happened?

The PEG has evolved since then.

> As I've said elsewhere, I'd like to see limitation to triples
> except, where syllabic consonants don't count.

But triples is totally arbitrary. I don't like unsubstantiated
restrictions.

> I do not support aligning cmene with fu'ivla (or anything else)
> morphologically; we already fuck with people's names enough.

You always have la'o if you don't like to lojbanize.

I find it outrageous that {sktkplgntriktrptrsft.} is a valid
name while {djeimz.} is not. What was the rationale for that
again?

> > Issue3: Rafsi
> >
> > All fu'ivla can be used as final rafsi, and all have a non-final
> > rafsi by adding 'y.
>
> s/have a/can be a/ ?
>
> Did you mean {'y} there or {y}?

No, you do need the '.

> Can you give an example? How does one distinguish between fu'ivla
> lujvo and regular lujvo?

For example:

fu'ivla: .iglu.
initial rafsi: .iglu'y- gives for example .iglu'yxabju
final rafsi: -'iglu gives for example bardy'iglu
medial rafsi -'iglu'y- gives for example bardy'iglu'yxabju

> > non-y cmavo can have non-final rafsi by adding 'y
>
> Very ditto.
>
> What about final rafsi for cmavo?

For CV cmavo, we could use the cmavo itself, but CVV cmavo
would conflict with CVV rafsi, so cmavo can't be used in
final position.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250