Controversial points in the morphology
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Jorge Llambas wrote:
> I find it outrageous that {sktkplgntriktrptrsft.} is a valid
> name while {djeimz.} is not. What was the rationale for that
> again?
It is because JCB found out that /mz/ could not reliably be distinguished
from /nz/. Why /mz/ was outlawed instead of /nz/ I suppose we'll never
know.
--
Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/
Twinkle, twinkle little star
I don't wonder what you are,
For by spectroscopic ken,
I know that you are hydrogen.
--Ian Bush