Controversial points in the morphology
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 20:18, Jorge "LlambÃas" wrote:
> --- Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > How would you lex this?:
> > /lobabariyXANtyzmababariyGARnygrilexotciMINiytca/
>
> Hmm... as a single brivla.
I was thinking {lo babariyxantyzma ba bariygarnygri le xotciminiytca}.
> More problematic would have been if you had thrown in a {la} in there.
>
> Of course, {lobabariyXANtyzmababariyGARnygrilexotciMIN.} is a valid
> cmene, so there's not much we can do about it. You still need a pause
> at the beginning of a cmene to separate it from other words, even when
> it is in rafsi form.
So you're making a class of brivla that require a pause and that don't
necessarily have a consonant cluster in the first five letters (or first two
syllaboids, if it's changed to that). This is too big a change for me to
agree with it.
phma
--
1 m = 3*3*5*7*47*44351/73/293339 * Cs133