Controversial points in the morphology
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:28:04PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> >
> > How would {zo .melanis. cmene lamelanis.} parse?
>
> I'm not aware of *any* (serious) morphology that would stop the "me"
> there from breaking off, generating "zo me la nis". Certainly
> that's how camxes currently works.
>
> Clearly you intended this example to demonstrate a problem and, as
> usual, I have no idea what that problem is. Do you think you could
> be a *tad* more verbose?
How would you quote the word {melanis.} then? Would such words
be unquotable with {zo}?
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com