Controversial points in the morphology
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 04:01:51PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:48:53PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> > > How would you quote the word {melanis.} then? Would such words
> > > be unquotable with {zo}?
> >
> > They already are; there is no morphology I am aware of where
> > that does not break up. I think it probably even breaks up in
> > the pause-on-both-sides scheme.
>
> No, why should it?
/me thinks.
Nevermind.
> > It certainly breaks up in camxes at this time:
>
> Yes. Currently camxes follows the no doi/la/lai/la'i rule,
It does? Oh. I thought it didn't.
> so {melanis} is not a single word, it is three words.
- nod*
This seem handled easily enough in my proposal by adding ZO to the
list of things that can precede a cmene.
-Robin