methods of resolving mismatches between place structures and number of overt sumti
Jorge LlambÃas scripsit:
> {lo'i broda be zi'o} is a superset, not a subset, of {lo'i broda}.
Indeed. You mistook my strawman for a real argument: zi'o cannot be
defined as a mere projection.
> For example,
> {lo se cmima be zi'o}, a "bemembered thing" but without the place for the
> members, can be things (one thing actually) without any members,
> whereas {lo se cmima} can't. {broda} could be a projection of {broda be zi'o},
> not the other way around.
But it's only in specialized cases that we definitely know what things are
broda be zi'o but not broda be da, like this one. Most of the time, it's
a huge semantic defining effort that hasn't even been begun.
--
And it was said that ever after, if any John Cowan
man looked in that Stone, unless he had a jcowan@reutershealth.com
great strength of will to turn it to other www.ccil.org/~cowan
purpose, he saw only two aged hands withering www.reutershealth.com
in flame. --"The Pyre of Denethor"