WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


BPFK Sections

posts: 2388


> On 5/8/05, John E Clifford
> <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > Each of these has within memory gone the
> other
> > way. In any case, they are good reasons for
> not
> > connecting tags too rigorously with the
> > "corresponding" brivla.
>
> But this is independent of the corresponding
> brivla, it is
> purely a matter of tags, even if they don't
> have any
> corresponding brivla.
>
> {A i pu je ri'a B} goes with {B pu je se ri'a
> A}, no matter what
> the brivla.
>
I wasn't commenting directly on the issue, just
taking another opportunity to make a point --
relevant to all the tag sections, to be sure.
And, of course, the two cases are exactly
opposite with repect to the brivla associated
with them. (But use to be so the other way 'round
-- and have occasionally agreed).