WikiDiscuss

On 6/13/05, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:06:28PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > The method is not unspecified, it is specified by the main bridi.
> > That's what "as a method for..." says.
>
> See, and I just don't agree. Guess I have to change the keyword.
> "se ta'i" attaches a methodologically performed event to the main
> bridi; it does not *necessarily* turn the main bridi into a method,
> although that's certainly a reasonable reading.

But do you think that's just a quirk of {se ta'i}, or do you also
have to change the definitions of {ta'i} so that the main bridi is
not necessarily the se tadni, and {ki'u} so that the maiun bridi
is not necessarily the se krinu, and {te zu'e} so that the main
bridi is not necessarily the se zukte, and {se pi'o} so that the
main bridi is not necessarily the te pilno, etc.?

mu'o mi'e xorxes