WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


BPFK Section: Epistemology sumtcita

posts: 14214

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 06:17:11PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> On 6/13/05, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:06:28PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > > The method is not unspecified, it is specified by the main
> > > bridi. That's what "as a method for..." says.
> >
> > See, and I just don't agree. Guess I have to change the
> > keyword. "se ta'i" attaches a methodologically performed event
> > to the main bridi; it does not *necessarily* turn the main bridi
> > into a method, although that's certainly a reasonable reading.
>
> But do you think that's just a quirk of {se ta'i}, or do you also
> have to change the definitions of {ta'i} so that the main bridi is
> not necessarily the se tadni, and {ki'u} so that the maiun bridi
> is not necessarily the se krinu, and {te zu'e} so that the main
> bridi is not necessarily the se zukte, and {se pi'o} so that the
> main bridi is not necessarily the te pilno, etc.?

The latter; BAI adds places with a fuzzy connection to the main
bridi. IMO.

Are those the only ones with that problem?

-Robin