WikiDiscuss

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:17:45PM -0400, xod wrote:
> Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote:
>
> >do stidi ma i mi se mansa lo nu na pilno zo loi i ku'i da'i ka'e
> >pilno zo loi lo nu basna lo ka su'oremei

xorxes:
What are you suggesting? I am satisfied with not using "loi", but I
suppose one could use "loi" to emphasize the property of being a
two-or-more-some.

> la xunre cu kajde fi lo nu pilno zo loi lo ka ce'u su'omei .i xy.
> jinvi le du'u malgli

xod:
The Red Book I assume warns against using "loi" for the property of
two-some-ness. It suggests that that is malglico.

-Robin

--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." — David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi