WikiDiscuss

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:57:48PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- xod <xod@thestonecutters.net> wrote:
> > Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote:
> > >--- xod <xod@thestonecutters.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >>la xunre cu kajde fi lo nu pilno zo loi lo ka ce'u=20 su'omei .i
> > >>xy. jinvi le du'u malgli

xod:
The Red Book I assume warns against using "loi" for the property of
at-least-one-some-ness. It suggests that that is malglico.

> > >iseki'ubo mi na ba stidi la'e di'u

xorxes:
Therefore I will not suggest that.

> > .ienai mi jimpe tu'a lo ka ce'u su'omei ku goi sy. le do stidi vi
> > la'o
> > {http://www.lojban.org/tiki//tiki-index.php?page=3DBPFK+Section%3A+gadri}

xod:
I disagree; I understand that the property of at-least-one-some-ness,
which we'll call S, is your suggestion in the BPFK gadri section.

> ku'i la'e di'u na mintu lo glico ka su'oremei i gy mapti ge lu su'ore
> broda li'u gi lu lo su'ore broda li'u iseki'ubo mi na tavla fi zoi gy
> plural gy

xorxes:
However, that's not the same as the English property of
at-least-two-some-ness. English fits both "su'o re broda" and
"lo su'o re broda". Therefore, I didn't say "plural".

-Robin

--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." — David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi