WikiDiscuss

John E Clifford wrote:

>Let me stress that my comments were directed at the use of {nitcu lo} and {djica lo} in place of {nitcu tu'a lo} and {djica tu'a lo} as stock examples, not at other problems with the new {lo}. As a solution to the opaque context "problem" in Lojban, the new {lo} is both inadequate and ineffective.
>
>

It was my understanding that the new lo is opaque, not su'oda,
intentional, Mister, and suitable for "needed boxes" and off-white
unicorns. If it is not, or if those concepts are not identical
(rendering my understanding into a confused mess) then I and others will
need concrete use-cases showing the errors I've made, and the actual
difficulties this presents. (In fact, the response will have to be even
clearer than this very paragraph of mine, which unfortunately is above
the heads of many of the BF commissioners, who have not attended the
jboske seminar series; thus the need for concrete example sentences.)

mu'o mi'e xod

--
Motorists honked in celebration in this Ramadi as news spread of the assassination of the president of the Iraqi Governing Council Ezzidin Salim Monday. "The GC is nothing," one man shouted. "They are not the Governing Council. They are the Prostitution Council."