WikiDiscuss

pc:
> And just how would those contexts be described? What
> separates {la crlakolmz xabju la lndn} from {la tonibler xabju la lndn} so
> that we can sort out what is real from what is not.

If the names themselves are not enough, you could add something
explicit {la crlakolmz noi se cfika} or maybe {la crlakolmz xabju
la lndn sei cfika}.

> 2: Or with a somewhat longer cmavo list, either more quantifiers or perhaps
> more "trenses" "in story" relevantly in this cse.

I don't see the Lojban community adopting a whole set of new cmavo
at this stage. One or two maybe, but drastic new incorporations, I
don't see it. More likely is the adoption of something already
existing with perhaps a different or more specialized meaning than
what it was planned for. But you can always propose new ones if you
think they are worth it.

> And, of course, all of
> these (like everything else in Lojban) are optional in most speech
> situations. The point is to have the tools when more precision is needed.

Indeed.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/