WikiDiscuss

I wrote:
> Not having a quantifier means
> for example that {lo broda na brode} is always equivalent to
> {naku lo broda cu brode}: "brodas don't brode" = "it is not the
> case that brodas brode", which obviously fails if lo has a hidden
> quantifier that you have to glork.

The first should have been {lo broda naku brode}.

(I think {na} should only have scope to its right, but it is
defined as having scope over the whole bridi. In the case of
lo without quantifier that doesn't matter.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/