Talk:spero
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
First proposed (with a real chance back then of it becoming official!) by John Cowan[1], rejected at Logfest 91[2].
- kir:
- According to proposal in chapter 4.16 of The Book, fu'ivla spe'ato can be used instead. How do you like this?
- Jay:
- spe'anto is better, IMO.
- kir:
- But The Book explicitely suggests CCVVCV for cultural fu'ivla!
- nitcion:
- This being a strawpoll :-) , I'm diehard behind bangrnesperanto.
- Maybe banrsperanto? Being hardcore fundamentalist, I avoid this as not being canonical per the Book.
- ???!!! How is it not canonical? Fine: "not the default strategy suggested."
- .kreig.daniyl.:
- spero all the way!
- tsali:
- Well, I'm in favour of pacnybau.
- xod:
- Since I think we need to jettison all cultural gismu (except lojbo) and replace them with stage threes, Esperanto is no exception!
- Read more here.
- And Rosta:
- pe'i it is okay to keep cultural gismu and add new ones so long as the existing ones lose their rafsi (in usage or in Ideal Lojban). See Boo to cultural gismu.
- Plastic Raven:
- The idea of cultural gismu is totes inconsistent, considering the nature of Lojban. However, the prefixes and suffixes are sometimes useful.