Number theory Posted by rlpowell on Mon 23 of Aug, 2004 17:58 GMT posts: 14214 Use this thread to discuss the Number theory page.
Posted by rlpowell on Mon 23 of Aug, 2004 17:59 GMT posts: 14214 I have no idea what "unit" means that "integer" doesn't cover, and that's covered by mulna'u (see Abstract Algebra). --rlpowell A unit in an integral domain is a number that every number is divisible by; e.g. the units in Z are 1 and -1, and the units in the Gaussian integers are 1, i, -1, and -i. -phma Oh, OK. This should all have gone in discuss, sorry. My bad. -Robin
Posted by rlpowell on Mon 23 of Aug, 2004 18:03 GMT posts: 14214 Here's the discussion that was on the page before I cleaned it up: prime: cmuna'ux1 is a prime number in integral domain x2 I'd consider that to mean "unit" and not "prime". I suggest: prime: ralju namcu: ralna'un1=r1 is a prime number in integral domain r2 Something more like zilterfendi, i should think... unit: jicmu namcu: cmuna'un1=j1 is a unit of integral domain j2 I have no idea what "unit" means that "integer" doesn't cover, and that's covered by mulna'u (see Abstract Algebra). --rlpowell A unit in an integral domain is a number that every number is divisible by; e.g. the units in Z are 1 and -1, and the units in the Gaussian integers are 1, i, -1, and -i. -phma "prime" is clearly something with selci. Furthermore, it's clearly a mulna'u; I suggest mulna'usle, which I'll now go put in jbovlaste --rlpowell ko'a goi lo na pilji be ko'e bei ko'e goi lo kantu namcu na du ko'a
Posted by rlpowell on Mon 23 of Aug, 2004 18:09 GMT posts: 14214 The original text of the page had: n1=j1 is a unit of integral domain j2 for cmuna'u, but that's not what arj entered on jbovlaste. Is this likely to be a problem? -Robin
Posted by Anonymous on Wed 12 of Jan, 2005 00:29 GMT Re: Number theory The original text of the page had: n1=j1 is a unit of integral domain j2 for cmuna'u, but that's not what arj entered on jbovlaste. Is this likely to be a problem? -Robin