Morphology: Rules of formation Posted by xorxes on Sun 27 of Feb, 2005 17:58 GMT posts: 1912 Use this thread to discuss the Morphology: Rules of formation page.
Posted by xorxes on Sun 27 of Feb, 2005 18:03 GMT posts: 1912 I have written the rules for generating lojban words, as opposed to the algorithm for breaking a speech stream into words, here: Please check that I didn't miss anything. (I didn't go here into the details of phonotactics: permissible clusters and such. Those can be found in: .) mu'o mi'e xorxes
Posted by xorxes on Sun 27 of Feb, 2005 22:09 GMT posts: 1912 > > Re: Morphology: Rules of formation > > I have written the rules for generating lojban words, as opposed to the > algorithm for breaking a speech stream into words, here: <http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Morphology%3A+Rules+of+formation> > > Please check that I didn't miss anything. > > (I didn't go here into the details of phonotactics: permissible clusters and > such. Those can be found in: <http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Morphology%3A+syllables> > .) > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > > > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/
Posted by Anonymous on Sun 27 of Feb, 2005 22:09 GMT >It can't contain la, lai, la'i, doi unless preceded by a >consonant and/or followed by an h. What about {laus} and {ala'um}? The rule should be "...and/or followed by a non-consonant". phma -- Without glasses, I can't even distinguish smells... -Les Perles de la médecine
Posted by xorxes on Sun 27 of Feb, 2005 22:09 GMT posts: 1912 > >It can't contain la, lai, la'i, doi unless preceded by a > >consonant and/or followed by an h. > > What about {laus} and {ala'um}? They're OK. > The rule should be "...and/or followed by a > non-consonant". Right. (I'm planning to remove the doi/la/lai/la'i stuff from my proposal anyway. But I will keep it commented out so it can eventually be restored if the change is not approved.) mu'o mi'e xorxes __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Posted by Anonymous on Mon 28 of Feb, 2005 20:48 GMT >Between two cmavo of form CVCy (without an intervening pause) and a brivla or CVV cmavo. What about two cmavo of form CVCy and a longer cmavo? phma -- My monthly periods happen once per year. -Les Perles de la médecine
Posted by xorxes on Mon 28 of Feb, 2005 20:48 GMT posts: 1912 > >Between two cmavo of form CVCy (without an intervening pause) and a brivla > or > CVV cmavo. > > What about two cmavo of form CVCy and a longer cmavo? CVCyCVVV breaks as {CV Cy CVVV}, no need to pause, is there? The only reason CVV cmavo are special is that they look like rafsi, but longer (or shorter) cmavo don't. mu'o mi'e xorxes __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Posted by noras on Thu 03 of Mar, 2005 06:55 GMT posts: 23 At 12:13 PM 2/28/05 -0800, Jorge wrote: >--- Pierre Abbat wrote: > > > >Between two cmavo of form CVCy (without an intervening pause) and a brivla > > or > > CVV cmavo. > > > > What about two cmavo of form CVCy and a longer cmavo? > >CVCyCVVV breaks as {CV Cy CVVV}, no need to pause, is there? > >The only reason CVV cmavo are special is that they look >like rafsi, but longer (or shorter) cmavo don't. > >mu'o mi'e xorxes How about "resytosmAbru"? re + sy + to (a CV, not a CVV) + smabru? Or lujvo resytosmabru (as current language has it)? mi'e noras noras@cox.net Nora LeChevalier
Posted by Anonymous on Thu 03 of Mar, 2005 06:55 GMT On Wednesday 02 March 2005 21:13, Nora LeChevalier wrote: > At 12:13 PM 2/28/05 -0800, Jorge wrote: > >--- Pierre Abbat wrote: > > > >Between two cmavo of form CVCy (without an intervening pause) and a > > > > brivla > > > > > > or > > > CVV cmavo. > > > > > > What about two cmavo of form CVCy and a longer cmavo? > > > >CVCyCVVV breaks as {CV Cy CVVV}, no need to pause, is there? > > > >The only reason CVV cmavo are special is that they look > >like rafsi, but longer (or shorter) cmavo don't. > > > >mu'o mi'e xorxes > > How about "resytosmAbru"? re + sy + to (a CV, not a CVV) + smabru? Or > lujvo resytosmabru (as current language has it)? Good example. The rule I follow in valfendi is that a pause is required between a cmavo of form Cy and the next word which contains CCV, CVV, or CV'V. So if you wanted to say {re sy to smabru}, you have to pause between {sy} and {to} or between {to} and {smabru}. I normally put the pause right after the Cy unless the next word is {bu}. phma -- Without glasses, I can't even distinguish smells... -Les Perles de la médecine
Posted by xorxes on Thu 03 of Mar, 2005 12:39 GMT posts: 1912 > At 12:13 PM 2/28/05 -0800, Jorge wrote: > > > > >Between two cmavo of form CVCy (without an intervening pause) and a > brivla > > > or > > > CVV cmavo. > > How about "resytosmAbru"? re + sy + to (a CV, not a CVV) + smabru? Or > lujvo resytosmabru (as current language has it)? It's a lujvo, as in the current language. I should have said "a string of one or more rafsi" instead of "a brivla", and that will in fact also cover CVV cmavo. I will fix that in the wording of the rules of formation, thanks. The relevant PEG rule is: CVCy-lujvo <- CVC-rafsi y h? initial-rafsi* brivla-core / stressed-CVC-rafsi y short-final-rafsi mu'o mi'e xorxes __ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
Posted by xorxes on Thu 03 of Mar, 2005 12:55 GMT posts: 1912 > The rule I follow in valfendi is that a pause is required > between a cmavo of form Cy and the next word which contains CCV, CVV, or > CV'V. That requires too much though. For example, you don't allow {.ibymai} without pause, but that can't be anything but {.i by mai}. The simple rule is to require a pause *always* after Cy. If we relax the rule, then let's relax it as much as possible, not to some arbitrary intermediate point. mu'o mi'e xorxes __ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/