WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


Relative Clauses and Phrases

posts: 2388

Why do ugly things have to be so damned handy? I take it that M1 = A1 = le ci lo prenu. the generalization is that these inserts go to the sumti whose gadri they (more or less) immediately follow. How do we get {ci lo prenu}, a phrase we are more likely to want to repeat (referentially) than {lo prenu} probably. To do for anaphora again.
Jorge LlambĂ­as <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
pc:
> I am not delighted to learn that someone would actually use such a gloppy
> expression as {le goi ko'a prenu}. On the other hand, things like that might
> provide some help for issues oof which of teh several coterminal sumti is
> meant; maybe {le goi k'oa ci lo prenu} v. {le ci lo goi ko'a prenu}.

There are three afterthought versions:

A1- le ci lo prenu ku ku goi ko'a}
A2- le ci lo prenu ku goi ko'a ku}
A3- le ci lo prenu goi ko'a ku ku}

two middlethought versions:

M1- {le goi ko'a ci lo prenu}
M2- {le ci lo goi ko'a prenu}

and one forethought:

F1- {ko'a goi le ci lo prenu}

I wonder which one corresponds with which.
I would hazzard

F1=A1, ko'a = le ci lo prenu;
M1=A2, ko'a = ?
M2=A3, ko'a = lo prenu.

mu'o mi'e xorxes





__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail