BPFK Section: Inexact Numbers
wrote:
>
> > noncontroversial: if a change presupposes
> some
> > other changes, they should be dealt with as
> well,
> > so that each section begins pretty much from
> the
> > basics (CLL in this case).
>
> I wouldn't have thought this was going to be
> controversial.
> It is not even really a change, just a
> generalization of CLL.
>
Well, there is also the matter that, to get this
to work as a generalization, you appear to have
to take {PA1 loi PA2 broda} as "PA1 masses of PA2
broda each," a view that you proposed, backed off
from and then presented as gospel. I should
think that the fact that you backed off from it
because of several protests makes it
controversial.