WikiDiscuss

---

> <<
> That still leaves the question as to the difference if any between
> {me'o py. implik.bu ky.bu} and {me'o vei py. ni'e nafyvlina ky.bu} and
> {me'o vei py. na.a ky.bu}. They are all grammatical, but are they all
> sensical?, and if so, do they mean the same thing? >>
>
> I don’t get the imprssion from the wordlists that {ni’e} would work in this
> way, but then it is remarkably unclear just how it does work.

ni'e makes an operator, something like su'i, out of a selbri.
{ni'e nafyvlina} works like {su'i}. (In fact {su'i} can be taken
as a short form of {ni'e sumji}.) {vei py. su'i ky.bu} is the
sum P + Q, {vei py. ni'e nafyvlina ky.bu} is the implication
if P then Q. How would you expect it to work?

...
> <<{me'o} for example can't deal with {su'i} because it is not a complete
> expression. Similarly it can't deal with the physical expression nor
> with
> the bit of language {na.a}.>>

I had forgotten about {me'o su'ibu}, the MEX expression of
(operand?) su'ibu.

...
> {zai xircutci bu} would seem to select the Horse-shoe alphabet...>>
>
> Yes, what seems to be needed is {lau}, though what the “two-word” means in
> its definition is unclear. Nor is it clear that we then need {bu}.

{lau} has to be followed by a lerfu, such as {by}, {ky.bu}, {valsi bu},
etc. {bu} is needed for all lerfu except members of BY.

> ko ciska lo xircutci tarmi sinxa le tanbo
> ?ko ciska me'o xircutci bu le tanbo
> ?ko ciska me'o nafyvlina bu le tanbo
> ko ciska me'o vei py na.a ky.bu le tanbo
> ?ko ciska me'o py nafyvlina bu ky.bu le tanbo>>
>
> “?” indeed. I don’t know about any of these, which is why I am
> asking.

We can only speculate. The clearest path is usually to avoid
mekso altogether.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html