BPFK Super-Section: BAI sumtcita
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 03:32:09PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
>
> > > It's the only interpretation that's consistent with the fact
> > > that "mi punaijeca klama" means "naku mi pu klama .ije mi ca
> > > klama", an identity which has held since Loglan days.
> >
> > Those are *VERY* different.
> >
> > The {mu'i} one reduces the main bridi to a non-veridical status.
>
> Well, so does the punai one.
It most certainly does *not*.
{naku mi pu klama .ije mi ca klama}
definately still means that I ca klama. It's a seperate sentence,
and sentences are veridical.
The version you snipped for BAI+NAI relegated the original bridi to
a {lo nu} clause, which are, IIRC, *not* veridical.
It's a radical difference.
-Robin