PEG Morphology Algorithm
On Friday 17 December 2004 09:53, John E Clifford wrote:
> Does the restriction on {ntc/nts/ndj/ndz} mean
> that NONE of them can occur? This seems
> excessive; at most the recogninition patterns
> would require that not all of them occur, that
> some distinctions are neutralized at this point.
> It would seen that, for example, both {ntc} and
> {ndz}(except perhaps before {i}) could both
> occur.
They are forbidden because they can be confused with {nc/ns/nj/nz}. Spend a
year in a southern city and you'll find out why.
phma
--
GCS/M d- s-: a+ C++ UL++++$ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+ o? K? w-- O? M- V- Y++
PGP++ t- 5? X? R- !tv b++ DI !D G e++ h+>---- r- y>+++