WikiDiscuss

On Saturday 25 December 2004 18:36, Jorge "Llambías" wrote:
> We seem to have different ideas about what is complicated.
> Allowing {kuabroda} but not {kaubroda} as a fu'ivla is
> more complicated than saying that both cases are disallowed
> for the same reason: they both break as cmavo + gismu.
>
> Pierre, does valfendi accept {kuabroda} as a fu'ivla?

No. It breaks {kua} off and calls it an error.
>kua< (broda)

phma
--
Ils pensent que j'ai un cancer du thé russe...
-Les Perles de la médecine